Related tips and tricks Rich wealthy incomestream money:

Things women like

...Them, but that you want to take them and make mad love to her!   Money.  Women like money but really love is by far more important.  Yes, you will run into women who like rich guys, but most really want the overall love and support of a nice guy.... things women like

Quick tips to make extra money

...Garbage bags of aluminum cans. The glass soda and milk bottles are usually stamped with the amount to be paid when you take them into the recycling center.While each of these quick tips are not going to make you rich, you are going to be able to enjoy something new in the habits that you pick up. For example, you can take your family out to dinner, lunch or buy something new that you have been... quick tips to make extra money

Sperm donation: make $800 a month as a sperm donor

...The sperm donor is paid $500 to complete an exit blood screening While this clearly isn't enough money to get rich, it's a good amount considering how little effort is required. Have you been a sperm donor and want to share your experiences?  Do you... sperm donation: make $800 a month as a sperm donor

How to get rich - learn not to be afraid of mistakes

...Are you afraid to make a mistake that will ruin your financial life forever ? Do you think the wealthy never make mistakes ? Truth is, mistakes are common but not life changing ! Fear of Trying One of the biggest obstacles to building wealth is the fear of trying something new. In order... how to get rich - learn not to be afraid of mistakes

Win money roulette

...Wheel. A lot of new players think the best way to win money at roulette is to place small bets and hope they win big, but these hopes are about as realistic as trying to strike it rich playing the lottery. Instead, place a number of bets on the table at once. Mix conservative and risky wagers. The more likely bets will help you keep breaking even or winning small amounts of money while one... win money roulette

Best sellers Products

Wed, 17 December 2014

Tradekmk(tm) black foldable stand slim folio leather carrying case cover protective for samsung galaxy s3 i9300, with free stylus, screen protector and cleaning cloth

Fri, 12 December 2014

Safety 1st ultrasonic 360 humidifier

Latest news talk Rich wealthy incomestream money:

2014/12/24 Blood money: affordable sum stressed
Saudi scholars and lawyers have called for effective steps to stop the phenomenon of people convening big tribal gatherings to demand exorbitant amounts in diya (blood money) from relatives of murder convicts, saying it does not conform to Islamic teachings and social values.

2014/12/22 3 money mistakes you must fix to get rich
Shark Tank star Kevin O'Leary says you need to understand your relationship to money.

Kennedy Wealth Management, LLC, 23901 Calabasas Road, Suite1000, Calabasas, CA, 91302. Phone: 818-224-4177 Contact Person: Mark Kennedy Contact Email: Website: You Tube URL:

Kennedy Wealth Management, LLC-1.jpgDate: Aug 30, 2011, 6:48 AM
Number of Comments on Photo:0

View Photo

It is a joke to suggest that capitalism rewards in proportion to risk. There is little or no relationship between income and the risk that person faces. Indeed, it would be fairer to say that return is inversely proportional to the amount of risk a person faces. . . . In terms of risk, the investor is wealthy enough to have spread their money so far that, in practical terms, there is none. . . . The suggestion that risk taking is the source and justification for profits ignores the fact that virtually all human activity involves risk. To claim that capitalists should be paid for the risks associated with investment is to implicitly state that money is more valuable that human life. After all, workers risk their health and often their lives in work and often the most dangerous workplaces are those associated with the lowest pay. Moreover, providing safe working conditions can eat into profits and by cutting health and safety costs, profits can rise. This means that to reward capitalist "risk", the risk workers face may actually increase. In the inverted world of capitalist ethics, it is usually cheaper (or more "efficient") to replace an individual worker than a capital investment. Unlike investors, bosses and the corporate elite, workers do face risk to life or limb daily as part of their work. Life is risky and no life is more risky that that of a worker who may be ruined by the "risky" decisions of management, capitalists and investors seeking to make their next million. While it is possible to diversify the risk in holding a stock portfolio that is not possible with a job. A job cannot be spread across a wide array of companies diversifying risk. In other words, workers face much greater risks than their employers and, moreover, they have no say in what risks will be taken with their lives and livelihoods. . . . Management rarely get pay cuts, indeed they often get bonuses and "incentive" schemes to get them to do the work they were (over) paid to do in the first. When a corporate manager makes a mistake and their business actually fails, his workers will suffer far more serious consequences than him. In most cases, the manager will still live comfortably (indeed, many will receive extremely generous severance packages) while workers will face the fear, insecurity and hardship of having to find a new job. Indeed . . . it is the risk of unemployment that is a key factor in ensuring the exploitation of labour in the first place. As production is inherently collective under capitalism, so must be the risk, . . consequently, risk cannot be used to justify excluding people from controlling their own working lives or the fruit of their labour. . . . [M]ost kinds of "risks" within capitalism do not contribute to production and, thanks to state aid, not that risky. Looking at the typical "risk" associated with capitalism, namely putting money into the stock market and buying shares, the idea that "risk" contributes to production is seriously flawed. As David Schweickart points out, "[i]n the vast majority of cases, when you buy stock, you give your money not to the company but to another private individual. You buy your share of stock from someone who is cashing in his share. Not a nickel of your money goes to the company itself. The company's profits would have been exactly the same, with or without your stock purchase." In fact between 1952 and 1997, about 92% of investment was paid for by firms' own internal funds and so "the stock market contributes virtually nothing to the financing of outside investment." . . . In other words, most investment is simply the "risk" associated with buying a potential income stream in an uncertain world. . . . As such, investing in shares may rearrange existing wealth (often to the great advantage of the rearrangers) but it does produce anything. . . . Appeals to "risk" to justify capitalism are somewhat ironic, given the dominant organisational form within capitalism -- the corporation. These firms are based on "limited liability" which was designed explicitly to reduce the risk faced by investors. . . . Stockholding could not becomes a truly attractive option . . . until that risk was removed, which it soon was. By the middle of the nineteenth century, business leaders and politicians broadly advocated changing the law to limit the liability of shareholders to the amounts they had invested in a company. . . . This means that limited liability allows corporations to raise funds for riskier enterprises by reducing risks and costs from the owners and shifting them onto other members of society (i.e. an externality). It is, in effect, a state granted privilege to trade with a limited chance of loss but with an unlimited chance of gain. This is an interesting double-standard. It suggests that corporations are not, in fact, owned by shareholders at all since they take on none of the responsibility of ownership, especially the responsibility to pay back debts. Why should they have the privilege of getting profit during good times when they take none of the responsibility during bad times? Corporations are creatures of government, created with the social privileges of limited financial liability of shareholders. Since their debts are ultimately public, why should their profits be private? Needless to say, this reducing of risk is not limited to within a state, it is applied internationally as well. Big banks and corporations lend money to developing nations but "the people who borrowed the money [i.e. the local elite] aren't held responsible for it. It's the people . . . who have to pay [the debts] off . . . The lenders are protected from risk. That's one of the main functions of the IMF, to provide risk free insurance to people who lend and invest in risky loans. They earn high yields because there's a lot of risk, but they don't have to take the risk, because it's socialised. It's transferred in various ways to Northern taxpayers through the IMP and other devices . . . The whole system is one in which the borrowers are released from the responsibility. That's transferred to the impoverished mass of the population in their own countries. And the lenders are protected from risk." Capitalism, ironically enough, has developed precisely by externalising risk and placing the burden onto other parties -- suppliers, creditors, workers and, ultimately, society as a whole. "Costs and risks are socialised," in other words, "and the profit is privatised." . . . Given that the "signals emitted by the stock market are either irrelevant or harmful to real economic activity, and that the stock market itself counts for little or nothing as a source of finance" and the argument for risk as a defence of profits is extremely weak. Lastly, the risk theory of profit fails to take into account the different risk-taking abilities of that derive from the unequal distribution of society's wealth. As James Meade puts it, while "property owners can spread their risks by putting small bits of their property into a large number of concerns, a worker cannot easily put small bits of his effort into a large number of different jobs. . . . It should be noted that until the early nineteenth century, self-employment was the normal state of affairs and it has declined steadily to reach, at best, around 10% of the working population in Western countries today. It would be inaccurate, to say the least, to explain this decline in terms of increased unwillingness to face potential risks on the part of working people. Rather, it is a product of increased costs to set up and run businesses. . . . This means that going into business for yourself is always a possibility, but that option is very difficult without sufficient assets. Moreover, even if sufficient funds are found (either by savings or a loan), the risk is extremely high due to the inability to diversify investments and the constant possibility that larger firms will set-up shop in your area (for example, Wal-Mart driving out small businesses or chain pubs, cafes and bars destroying local family businesses). . . . So . . . taking a risk is much easier if you are wealthy and so risk is simply another means for rewarding the wealthy for being wealthy. In other words, risk aversion is the dependent, not the independent, factor. . . . Needless to say, the most serious consequences of "risk" are usually suffered by working people who can lose their jobs, health and even lives all depending on how the risks of the wealthy turn out in an uncertain world. As such, it is one thing to gamble your own income on a risky decision but quite another when that decision can ruin the lives of others. . . . Appeals of risk to justify capitalism simply exposes that system as little more than a massive casino. In order for such a system to be fair, the participants must have approximately equal chances of winning. However, with massive inequality the wealthy face little chance of loosing. For example, if a millionaire and a pauper both repeatedly bet a pound on the outcome of a coin toss, the millionaire will always win as the pauper has so little reserve money that even a minor run of bad luck will bankrupt him. Ultimately, "the capitalist investment game (as a whole and usually in its various parts) is positive sum. In most years more money is made in the financial markets than is lost. How is this possible? It is possible only because those who engage in real productive activity receive less than that to which they would be entitled were they fully compensated for what they produce. The reward, allegedly for risk, derives from this discrepancy." AFAQ

anarchy_symbol.pngDate: May 5, 2013, 5:25 PM
Number of Comments on Photo:0

View Photo

Kennedy Wealth Management, LLC, 23901 Calabasas Road, Suite1000, Calabasas, CA, 91302. Phone: 818-224-4177 Contact Person: Mark Kennedy Contact Email: Website: You Tube URL:

Kennedy Wealth Management, LLC-5.jpgDate: Aug 30, 2011, 6:48 AM
Number of Comments on Photo:0

View Photo

Classetecno: Do you wanna make money with a proveb step by step system ? Click on the link in my bio. #Makemoney #printmoney #buildyourdream #buildincome #workfromhome #workathome #beyourownboss #workonline #workwithdaniele #behappyand makemoney #freedom #lifestyle #free #moneydance #payday #money #income #enterpreneur #businesspeople #businessonline #newbusiness #jointhisbusiness #joinwithme #befree #happylife
Date: 2014-09-11 08:48:47 GMT

Zimdigitalbabwe: EmojiKing WEBSITE: SOUNDCLOUD MUSIC: HASHTAGS: 👆😉 #ZimDigitalAlbum coming soon on #iTunes #CDBABY #XBoxLive #web #RVAhiphop #nowplaying #music #zimdigitalbabwe #ZimDigital #Mayweather #EmojiKing #money #Lol #emojiart #cute #Girls #Cleanhiphop #studiolife #Engineering #Producer #unsignedhype #zdb4art #beats #art #photooftheday #TrueFactMusic #gaming #love
Date: 2014-09-11 08:33:57 GMT

Livealuxurylife: A lifestyle. A way of living. Can’t explain life without a MB 💎 Are you agree? | Via @preppygentlemen 💎#livealuxurylife #luxury #luxe #luxurious #lifestyle #luxurycars #supercars #mansions #watches #money #millionaire #rich #billionaire #wealthy #classy #exclusive #boss #goodlife #luxurylife #luxurylifestyle #jet #architecture #slsamg #mb #cclass #sclass #mercedesbenz #sls #amg #amggt
Date: 2014-09-11 08:37:58 GMT

To my Tumblr Peeps:

You guys are awesome!!!

Post on: 2014-03-23 15:27:19 GMT

Related hot talk Rich Wealthy Incomestream Money:

Chris Hemsworth Born Rich | Hayley Parsons Rich List | Loopholes Of The Rich | Loopholes Of The Rich Pdf | Seth Macfarlane Born Rich | Rich Wealthy Incomestream Money News | Rich Wealthy Incomestream Money